Yes, I do take that angle. Such is what pushes me to quest for more knowledge, more evidence.
Knowledge and evidence becomes meaningless if you think that nothing can be proven and that you cannot trust your senses.
Everything you learn will be of no value, and everything you do will be futile.
There is no proof in reality, only evidence and either belief or non-belief in said evidence.
What value is evidence if you cannot trust it? How do you know evidence even exists if you can't even be sure you exist? (see how pointless it is to think that way?)
How can one dismiss evidence and assert opinion as truth?
I never asserted an opinion as truth. I assert scientifically reasoned logic as truth.
Knowledge and evidence becomes meaningless if you think that nothing can be proven and that you cannot trust your senses.
Everything you learn will be of no value, and everything you do will be futile.
What value is evidence if you cannot trust it? How do you know evidence even exists if you can't even be sure you exist? (see how pointless it is to think that way?)
I never asserted an opinion as truth. I assert scientifically reasoned logic as truth.
How is agreement with a theory not opinion?
How is critical thinking futile and pointless?
I find it odd how you assume that lack of proof would nullify both knowledge and evidence.