Home / Images / Go Deeper
Go Deeper
|
Previous
«« Baby Disposal
|
Next
Catman »»
|
1
1 votes
Go Deeper
|
Previous
«« Baby Disposal
|
Next
Catman »»
|
goes to show that the average current generation has no clue as to windows ANYTHING prior to windows XP. It also goes to show that script or screen developers are just as clueless, but then most of the new movies are crap anyway.
If any of you realized what you were talking about you would realize that it is showing the BSOD (blue screen of death), not the DOS system.
What about CPM. Where is CPM. Dos would not be Dos with out CPM.
@Steve That makes no sense...he is running vm ware, windows over windows. Ifad would not scale to this joke at all.
That BSOD isn't addressing the proper system error.
Ya never know, he could have unplugged the Virtual PC (which is obviously a laptop) from it's powersource.. :D
also, that isn't windows 3.1 as it advertizes windows NT, which didn't exist during the support span of 3.1
actually windows nt isn't windows 3.1^^
of course it's not DOS...that would show up on the old black and gray screen....and I HAVE seen this screen, not more than a couple of weeks ago with my BRAND freaking new computer (the BLUE screen)
Hey scooper, it's windows virtual machine, not vmware. dumbass
Missed a few right?? oops sorry. If 95 / 98 / Me in the progression then the movie would have been only 20 min long. No reboots allowed
lol
so what happened to DOS box?
I saw that too!
Funny, but seriously? Win 3.1? when it clearly says win NT on it... w/e
Duh? Win 3.1 is apart of Windows NT, as is XP.
Whaaaa? I think somebody's either trolling, or a complete idiot....
Windows NT describes the whole family of microsoft OSes. Windows 3.1 up to W7 are considered part of the NT family.
If you've ever seen something formatted as NTFS it means that it uses the NT File System, which is why flashdrives formatted in NTFS won't work with Macs, but those formatted in FAT16 and FAT32 will.
Windows 3.1, 95, 98 and ME were all built over on the DOS architecture. Windows NT, 2000, XP, Vista and 7 are built on the NT architecture. Windows 3.1 was never a part of the "NT family."
May wanna research a little more before you go talking out your a$$... Windows NT was the first fully 32-bit version of Windows, whereas its consumer-oriented counterparts, Windows 3.1x and Windows 9x, were 16-bit/32-bit hybrids.
...The first release was given version number 3.1 to match the contemporary 16-bit Windows...
To further discredit.
Although various Microsoft publications, including a 1998 question-and-answer session with Bill Gates, reveal that the letters 'NT' were expanded to 'New Technology'[2] (a backronym) for marketing purposes, they originally stood for "N-Ten," the codename of the Intel i860 XR processor for which NT was initially developed.
and a final nail in the coffin
NTFS (New Technology File System)
... Mac OS X v10.3 and later include read-only support for NTFS-formatted partitions....
... NTFS write support has been discovered in Mac OS X 10.6, but has not been activated as of version 10.6.5, although hacks do exist to enable the functionality. ...
Refer to my comment on the reply below about the whole Mac thing, as I had earlier corrected myself (however, I did forget to edit my original comment). What was that about talking out of your ass?
And yes, the first 32-bit version of windows was NT, and in essence every Microsoft OS thereafter can be labelled as NT as they are based off of NT (presumably, mostly their file systems), as I said...
Now your point about the earlier 16-bit versions of Windows not being NT is correct, I did make a slight error when researching and generalized a bit too far. I concede this mistake, however I don't see what your point about the Intel technology at the time is proving other than reiterating a timeline that doesn't include earlier versions of Windows as NT.
by don't work...you mean write...as you can easily read a NTFS on a mac...
Yeah, I probably should have said 'with macs' instead of 'on macs'.
wat ? wat ? WTF ?
BWAAAAAAAAM
why so funny i can hardly stand it...
lol
Is James Bond real? Or Superman? Dick 'eads!
Clearly outplayed by Windows.